Tracking Your 'Biological Age' Over Time May Predict Death Risk Better Than a Single Snapshot
In over 90,000 Dutch adults followed for nearly 14 years, people whose biological age ran ahead of their calendar age had a higher risk of dying. More importantly, among 25,000 people measured twice, those whose biological age sped up over time faced even greater risk. People stuck in a pattern of accelerated aging had a 39% higher mortality risk compared to those aging at a normal pace. The results suggest that checking biological age once might not be enough.
Key Insight
This study suggests monitoring biological age over time could be more informative than a one-time measurement.
Original Paper
Related Studies
A New Blood Test Uses 8 Amino Acids to Estimate Your Biological Age
Scientists built a tool called AmiAge that estimates how old your body really is by measuring 18 amino acids in your blood. They then simplified it down to just 8 amino acids. People whose AmiAge was higher than their actual age tended to be frailer, had shorter telomeres, and got age-related diseases more often.
Strong Daily Rhythms Plus Exercise Cut Death Risk by Two-Thirds
Adults whose sleep-wake cycles followed a strong daily rhythm and who got enough exercise had a 65% lower risk of dying from any cause over about 7 years. The combo also slashed cardiovascular death risk by 75%. Part of the benefit seemed to come from slower biological aging, hinting that consistent routines matter as much as the workout itself.
Blood NAD+ Levels Stay Flat With Age, Challenging Popular Aging Theory
One of the most repeated ideas in longevity is that NAD+ declines as we age, a story that helped make NR and NMN household names in the space. This large, carefully controlled study takes a closer look. Across seven independent cohorts and more than 300 people, researchers found that whole-blood NAD+ levels stayed remarkably stable with age, and didn't shift meaningfully in response to exercise, protein-rich diets, or multimodal lifestyle interventions in older adults. Importantly, NR supplementation did raise blood NAD+ as expected, confirming that the supplements work pharmacologically, the question is just whether blood NAD+ is the right thing to be measuring in the first place.
Disclaimer: Research summaries are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to your health routine.